david.delagneau/fidelity-ai-workspace
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: Add analysis context and review guidance for ApexKitV3 impact write-up

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
David Delagneau
2026-04-14 16:36:52 -06:00
parent 6fcf3de2c3
commit 03386aa22f
1 changed files with 3 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
ai/logs/2026-04-14.md
View File

@@ -55,3 +55,6 @@
- The requested write-up should cover what change is being requested, build-error and component impact, what needs retesting, which flows/components are affected, and the overall risk including whether consumers should be involved in testing. - The requested write-up should cover what change is being requested, build-error and component impact, what needs retesting, which flows/components are affected, and the overall risk including whether consumers should be involved in testing.
- Jeff explicitly wants the document framed as carrying impact and consumer-testing risk if the change requires more than small adjustments. - Jeff explicitly wants the document framed as carrying impact and consumer-testing risk if the change requires more than small adjustments.
- Confirmed wording note: Quy should be treated as Scrum Master in prompts and write-ups, not described generically as a stakeholder. - Confirmed wording note: Quy should be treated as Scrum Master in prompts and write-ups, not described generically as a stakeholder.
- Additional analysis context for the ApexKitV3 investigation: the Swift version change was reverted back to Swift 5, and the Pods were updated to the latest versions including `ApexKitSwiftUI 1.27.14`. The current question is whether the ApexKitV3-removal impact remains the same under that updated dependency baseline.
- Document-review guidance for the ApexKitV3 impact write-up: it should not read as if code changes have already been made, should stay understandable for a non-technical reader, and should avoid overcommitting on production impact where SwiftUI-vs-legacy-path usage is still being verified.
- Additional document-review guidance: if the write-up already recommends consumer testing, it should not hedge with wording like `if the change extends beyond small cleanup`. The risk section should stay internally consistent and reflect the current conclusion directly.