Add daily logs and templates for project fidelity

- Created daily log entries for May 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, and 21, capturing work done, findings, and next steps.
- Established a daily logs index for easy navigation of daily notes.
- Developed templates for daily logs, decisions, meeting notes, people, systems, and work items to standardize documentation.
- Introduced base files for filtering and displaying various types of project knowledge, including daily notes, decisions, people, systems, work items, and workstreams.
- Added maps for current work, fidelity apps, and fidelity domain to enhance project navigation and context.
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-21 12:28:07 -06:00
parent 7cbb49134a
commit 1ad707373a
203 changed files with 449 additions and 434 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
---
type: system
project: fidelity
status: active
workstreams: [rest-migration, ao-discourse, xflow-debugging, xflow-swiftui-migration, consumer-integration]
related: [fid4, xflowviewmaker, ftframeworks, cogstore, consumer-integration, pdiap-14859, pdiap-15765, pdiap-15836, pdiap-15838]
updated: 2026-04-17
tags:
- system
- fidelity
---
# XFlowSDK
## Role
XFlowSDK is the backend-driven UI engine that renders Fidelity flows from service-provided configuration.
---
## Durable Context
- XFlow behavior depends on backend rules, entry point, and authentication state.
- SwiftUI migration work introduced recurring behavior questions that were not just visual; many were contract or lifecycle issues.
- XFlowSDK is developed in the dedicated repository `pr100660-xflow-for-ios`.
- Historical Slack patterns show recurring topics around:
- component type expansion in SwiftUI
- Next-button visibility rules
- markdown link handling and analytics
- modal presentation and dismissal sequencing
- consumer-vs-framework ownership boundaries
---
## Release Mechanics
- XFlowSDK publishing currently uses the Jenkins pipeline `xflow-for-ios-publish`.
- The publish flow builds the XCFramework, publishes it to internal Fidelity Artifactory at `artifactory.fmr.com`, and publishes the podspec to `ap010981-ios_podspecs_3x`.
- Once published, the new SDK version can be adopted downstream through `pod install` or `pod update`, but consumer validation still depends on XFlowViewMaker and Fid4 propagation.
---
## Debugging Implications
- Do not treat XFlow output as static UI; backend configuration can change the result.
- When behavior differs across environments, check whether the issue is:
- service/configuration driven
- auth-state driven
- entry-point driven
- consumer-integration driven
- Some apparent XFlow regressions historically turned out to be consumer, pipeline, or environment issues.
---
## Historical Signals From Slack
- SwiftUI behavior repeatedly needed parity work beyond UIKit assumptions.
- Next-button visibility logic required using the full set of service parameters, not only label text.
- Modal, delegate, and lifecycle sequencing became recurring themes in pure SwiftUI environments.
- XFlow work often had to be validated through consumer repositories, not only inside the SDK.