Add daily logs and templates for project fidelity
- Created daily log entries for May 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, and 21, capturing work done, findings, and next steps. - Established a daily logs index for easy navigation of daily notes. - Developed templates for daily logs, decisions, meeting notes, people, systems, and work items to standardize documentation. - Introduced base files for filtering and displaying various types of project knowledge, including daily notes, decisions, people, systems, work items, and workstreams. - Added maps for current work, fidelity apps, and fidelity domain to enhance project navigation and context.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
type: system
|
||||
project: fidelity
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
workstreams: [consumer-integration, xflow-swiftui-migration]
|
||||
related: [xflowsdk, fid4, ftframeworks, consumer-integration, pdiap-14859, pdiap-15765, pdiap-15836, pdiap-12284]
|
||||
updated: 2026-05-08
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- system
|
||||
- fidelity
|
||||
---
|
||||
# XFlowViewMaker
|
||||
|
||||
## Role
|
||||
|
||||
XFlowViewMaker is the adapter layer between XFlowSDK and consuming app/framework integration. It is under evaluation for reduction or removal.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Durable Context
|
||||
|
||||
- Historical release work often required bumping XFlowViewMaker alongside XFlowSDK before consumer validation was possible.
|
||||
- XFlowViewMaker was a recurring source of coupling between XFlow changes and Fid4 or flagship rollout.
|
||||
- Historical Slack evidence shows that version bumps through XFlowViewMaker were often blocked by external pipeline or dependency issues rather than pure feature regressions.
|
||||
- XFlowViewMaker currently lives in the monorepo `PR100660-ios-frameworks` under `Adapters/XFlowViewMaker`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Release Mechanics
|
||||
|
||||
- When XFlowSDK releases a new version, XFlowViewMaker usually needs a follow-up dependency bump before Fid4 can consume the change.
|
||||
- The common release flow is:
|
||||
- update the XFlowViewMaker podspec to the new XFlowSDK version
|
||||
- run `tuist generate -n`
|
||||
- run `pod install`
|
||||
- open a PR
|
||||
- wait for required approvals, including protected-branch/code-owner approval when applicable
|
||||
- merge, often through automerge once approvals are complete
|
||||
- let the Jenkins pipeline `publish-XFlowViewMaker` publish the adapter release
|
||||
- `publish-XFlowViewMaker` usually auto-detects the next version and commonly increments the minor version automatically.
|
||||
- The publish flow distributes the new adapter version through Artifactory/podspec channels and updates the XFlowViewMaker version on `main`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration Implications
|
||||
|
||||
- When a fix exists in XFlowSDK but is not visible in consumer validation, check whether XFlowViewMaker or downstream pinned versions are blocking adoption.
|
||||
- If the issue involves version propagation into Fid4, treat XFlowViewMaker as part of the release path unless direct-consumption work has replaced it.
|
||||
- Current understanding is that Fid4 does not consume XFlowSDK directly; XFlowViewMaker remains the required integration layer for Fid4 and for other consumers such as `FTAccountOpen` and `FTTransfer`.
|
||||
- Questions about removing or collapsing the layer should be evaluated against current consumer integration patterns, not just local SDK behavior.
|
||||
- For the current `PDIAP-12284` / `PDIAP-15836` migration planning, XFlowViewMaker is the preferred candidate owner for global host-mode resolution if product-code inspection confirms it can access the existing feature-flag abstraction cleanly. This avoids Fid4-owned per-flow mapping and keeps XFlowSDK decoupled from app-specific LaunchDarkly/Flagship clients.
|
||||
- The desired host-mode behavior for that migration is SwiftUI host by default, SwiftUI host when feature configuration is missing or unknown, and `UIHostingController` only when an explicit temporary fallback flag requests it.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Historical Signals From Slack
|
||||
|
||||
- XFlowViewMaker version bumps into flagship frequently surfaced `PreviewMacros.SwiftUI`, Apex, or pipeline compatibility issues.
|
||||
- Historical context shows growing pressure to reduce XFlowViewMaker-specific indirection and move toward simpler consumer paths.
|
||||
- Slack history also shows that tutorials and release steps around XFlowViewMaker were easy to misunderstand, which made version propagation a repeated risk.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user