chore: update work item statuses and daily logs for May 11, 2026, including new daily log entry and adjustments to dismissal sequencing validation

project-knowledge/02-work-items/pdiap-12284.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ systems: [xflowsdk, xflowviewmaker]
 workstreams: [xflow-swiftui-migration, consumer-integration]
 people: [jeff-dewitte]
 related: [pdiap-15836, pdiap-15838]
-updated: 2026-05-08
+updated: 2026-05-11
 tags:
   - work-item
   - fidelity
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ tags:
 - Quy already moved this story into the next sprint (`26Q2.6`); leave it in To Do until the sprint starts on Thursday.
 - Jeff directed David to do this UIKit-removal work and `PDIAP-15836` dismissal/lifecycle work in the same branch because both are disruptive enough to require consumer testing.
 - Current implementation direction is to avoid Fid4-owned per-flow host-mode mapping and evaluate XFlowViewMaker-owned global host-mode resolution.
+- David continued the implementation/validation loop on May 11; current simulator log review is promising for the SwiftUI-host dismissal sequencing in the tested run.
 
 ---
 
@@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ tags:
 - Desired host-mode model: SwiftUI host is the default, missing or unknown feature configuration should also default to SwiftUI, and `UIHostingController` should remain only as an explicit temporary fallback while consumers validate the migration.
 - XFlowSDK should not be coupled directly to LaunchDarkly, Flagship, or app-specific feature-flag clients; it should receive an already-resolved host-mode decision.
 - If `hostMode` must be passed through `FlowConfig` or a similar object, keep it as adapter/internal plumbing rather than a new consumer-facing per-flow responsibility.
+- The latest tested run reported the expected dismissal order for the SwiftUI-host path, but the branch still needs review of the shared host-mode routing and any required broader validation before story closure.
 
 ---