feat: add mem9 integration documentation, enhance AI-to-AI prompting guidelines, and create daily logs for May 1 and May 7
This commit is contained in:
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- For standups that may also be sent to Teams, keep the update concise, omit internal review-feedback details, and avoid phrasing like `confirmed` when the audience lacks the internal context for what was confirmed
|
||||
- When a release item is waiting on approvals or pipeline work, make the parallel story work explicit instead of making the update sound blocked on waiting alone
|
||||
- Standups should omit side questions or manager-only context refreshes unless they materially changed story work
|
||||
- For `PDIAP-16167` standups after May 1, do not report story creation as previous-day work unless the previous-workday evidence explicitly says the story was created that day; focus on report publication, findings shared, closure, or remaining follow-up instead
|
||||
- For `PDIAP-15838` standups, focus on Apollo-removal progress and the `PicoSDK` transitive dependency work; omit extra exploratory asks unless they directly changed the story outcome or created a blocker
|
||||
- If a root cause document or other documentation update directly supports a story, it should be reported under that story instead of as a separate standalone item
|
||||
- Standups should omit items not tied to a story unless they are real blockers
|
||||
|
||||
17
project-knowledge/02-work-items/IA improvements.md
Normal file
17
project-knowledge/02-work-items/IA improvements.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
- Experiment-driven investigation
|
||||
- Debug print auto added
|
||||
- Iteratively detect now possible debug prints
|
||||
- Structured ticket artifacts with jira, patch, prompts, sessions
|
||||
- Tolerant to pre-experiment fix steps to fix any build error between experiments
|
||||
- Swift skill, specialized to debug prints
|
||||
- Xcode logs analysis
|
||||
- Find and read the full Xcode artifacts
|
||||
- Extract relevant logs
|
||||
- Xcode Integration
|
||||
- Efficient use of xcode commands to build, test, contexted for tuist, cocoapods, sample projects
|
||||
- Execute unit test proficiently, like executing only new tests or related
|
||||
- Investigation: Differences from skills with cli commands vs mcps
|
||||
- Investigation: Differences of skills vs instructions from vscode copilot
|
||||
- Investigation: Differences from agents vs skills using agent, what is more general? correct relationship and use
|
||||
- Charles Proxy integration
|
||||
- LaunchDarkly integration
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ updated: 2026-05-04
|
||||
|
||||
## Work Done
|
||||
|
||||
- Created `PDIAP-16167 - AccountLink - XFlow causing web view rewrites investigation`.
|
||||
- Prepared the root-cause report for the FTTransfer AccountLink issue.
|
||||
- Verified that XFlow eventing does not appear to be the direct cause of the reload.
|
||||
- Verified that the issue persists when rolling back `XFlowSDK` to `v0.1.0`, which predates REST and modern architecture changes.
|
||||
|
||||
19
project-knowledge/06-daily/2026-05-07.md
Normal file
19
project-knowledge/06-daily/2026-05-07.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
type: daily
|
||||
project: fidelity
|
||||
date: 2026-05-07
|
||||
updated: 2026-05-07
|
||||
focus: [pdiap-15836, pdiap-12284, rest-validation]
|
||||
work-items: [PDIAP-15836, PDIAP-12284]
|
||||
blockers: [production-test-account]
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- daily
|
||||
- fidelity
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 2026-05-07
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Clarified REST validation context: forcing Fid4 production endpoints by editing `initializeAppEnvironment` is related to validating REST enablement, not to the Apollo-removal story. It was a point-in-time ask that may still be useful later, but the immediate need is access to a production test account to complete validation.
|
||||
- Clarified `PDIAP-15836` status: the dismissal approach David tested appears coupled to the `UIHostingController` removal path, but there may be a strategy to isolate the fix. David will investigate whether the lifecycle/dismissal fix can be applied independently.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user