refactor: update work items and daily logs for PDIAP-12284 and PDIAP-15836, enhancing host-mode resolution strategy and lifecycle sequencing
This commit is contained in:
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ tags:
|
||||
- `PDIAP-15838` is Done from a Jira/status perspective after external review feedback was addressed, but its draft PR must remain unmerged and kept current with `main` until REST backend production readiness and the required REST-toggle consumer validation window allow merge
|
||||
- `PDIAP-15836` has moved to In Progress. David found a possible minimal dismissal fix path that would not require removing `UIHostingController`, but Jeff directed David to do the `PDIAP-15836` dismissal/lifecycle work and `PDIAP-12284` UIKit-removal work in the same branch because both are disruptive enough to require consumer testing.
|
||||
- `PDIAP-12284` remains paired with `PDIAP-15836`; plan the branch as combined UIKit-removal / SwiftUI lifecycle work rather than splitting the dismissal sequencing into an independently merged path unless direction changes.
|
||||
- Current `PDIAP-12284` implementation direction is to explore XFlowViewMaker-owned global host-mode resolution rather than Fid4-owned per-flow host-mode mapping: SwiftUI host should remain the default, missing/unknown feature configuration should also default to SwiftUI, and `UIHostingController` should be selected only through an explicit temporary fallback flag.
|
||||
- Keep host-mode resolution decoupled from XFlowSDK and app-specific LaunchDarkly/Flagship clients; XFlowSDK should consume a resolved host-mode decision, while Copilot/code inspection should confirm whether XFlowViewMaker can use existing `FeatureEnabling` / `Featuring` abstractions or needs a small dependency-injection path.
|
||||
- Keep the separate `HybridBrokerageAccountOpening` / `JointIdentityCheck` scenario out of `PDIAP-15765` scope unless later evidence proves it belongs there
|
||||
- Include feature-flag planning for the broader UIKit-removal spike, including dismissal sequencing changes that affect consumers
|
||||
- Thoroughly verify current `ApexBridgingAddressComponent` / rule-loading usage before describing it as inactive or dead code
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,11 +24,11 @@ Update the per-ticket files first when scope, status, sequencing, or communicati
|
||||
|
||||
- `PDIAP-15836` - Modernize dismissal delegate lifecycle sequencing for pure SwiftUI environment
|
||||
Detail: `project-knowledge/02-work-items/pdiap-15836.md`
|
||||
Current note: moved to In Progress on May 7. David found a possible minimal dismissal fix path that would not require removing `UIHostingController`, but Jeff directed David to do the dismissal/lifecycle work and `PDIAP-12284` UIKit-removal work in the same branch because both changes require consumer testing.
|
||||
Current note: moved to In Progress on May 7. David found a possible minimal dismissal fix path that would not require removing `UIHostingController`, but Jeff directed David to do the dismissal/lifecycle work and `PDIAP-12284` UIKit-removal work in the same branch because both changes require consumer testing. The SwiftUI path still needs proof that delegate/session-clear callbacks fire only after dismissal completion.
|
||||
|
||||
- `PDIAP-12284` - Remove UIKit wrapping from XFlow
|
||||
Detail: `project-knowledge/02-work-items/pdiap-12284.md`
|
||||
Current note: reopened after rollback and should be handled with `PDIAP-15836` in the same branch. Jeff's current direction is to combine the UIKit-removal and dismissal/lifecycle changes because both are disruptive enough to require consumer testing; merge/release still waits until after REST-transition consumer validation.
|
||||
Current note: reopened after rollback and should be handled with `PDIAP-15836` in the same branch. Current implementation direction is to avoid Fid4 per-flow host-mode mapping and instead evaluate XFlowViewMaker-owned global host-mode resolution, with SwiftUI as default and `UIHostingController` only as an explicit temporary fallback; merge/release still waits until after REST-transition consumer validation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Backlog / Future Reference
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user