feat: Update rollout documents and work items for UIKit-removal spike, clarifying consumer communication and validation expectations
This commit is contained in:
@@ -20,12 +20,17 @@
|
||||
- Root cause was documented.
|
||||
- The original external report was incomplete.
|
||||
- For the config discussion, `CheckIdentity` was already correct. The `TeenIdentityCheck` issue had two config gaps inside `validation-rules`: the root key should be `validations`, and the age gate also needs `eighteenOrAbove` there when that rule is required.
|
||||
- Follow-up validation on April 13 showed two distinct authenticated scenarios rather than one uniform cross-platform issue.
|
||||
- A `HybridBrokerage` scenario reproduces on both iOS and Android.
|
||||
- A Youth-flow `TeenIdentityCheck` scenario works on Android but fails on iOS.
|
||||
- Current evidence suggests Android is more flexible in how it decodes rule variations, while iOS is stricter about the expected `validation-rules` structure.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Guidance
|
||||
|
||||
- Treat the issue as scoped and understood unless new evidence appears.
|
||||
- Treat the iOS-only Youth-flow discrepancy as the main client-side issue currently aligned with the story.
|
||||
- Keep the cross-platform `HybridBrokerage` scenario separate until it is clear whether it is a service/config issue, a distinct bug, or an unreported rule-processing difference.
|
||||
- Keep the authenticated-user qualifier whenever this ticket is mentioned.
|
||||
- Do not describe it as a generic validation issue without the `TeenIdentityCheck` and auth context.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user