david.delagneau/fidelity-ai-workspace
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: Update work item statuses and refine sprint planning for PDIAP-15838; adjust standup prompt guidelines

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
David Delagneau
2026-04-21 07:33:53 -06:00
parent 4d8948672b
commit 688b4d462a
5 changed files with 20 additions and 14 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
project-knowledge/06-daily/2026-04-20.md
View File

@@ -23,9 +23,8 @@ updated: 2026-04-20
## Work Done
- Moved `PDIAP-15765` to Done.
- Moved `PDIAP-14859` to Done.
- Updated `PDIAP-15838` to In Progress.
- Continued the REST activation investigation tied to `PDIAP-15838`.
- Refined the current Apollo-removal analysis and next implementation order for `PDIAP-15838`.
---
@@ -33,6 +32,7 @@ updated: 2026-04-20
- The immediate priority is no longer closeout work on the completed stories.
- The immediate priority is to investigate why REST is not activating.
- The earlier `Done` transitions for `PDIAP-15765` and `PDIAP-14859` should not be treated as April 20 work; they happened before this workday and should not be repeated in standups for this date.
- David confirmed the production build already contains the commit that added the LaunchDarkly flag, so the working hypothesis should move away from "missing code in production build" and toward LaunchDarkly evaluation context, targeting, initialization timing, or downstream gating conditions.
- David has source-code access and can use Charles Proxy during local investigation, but does not yet know where the LaunchDarkly context attributes are assembled on iOS.
- Jeff explicitly confirmed the REST-flag investigation should remain the priority over Adam's separate service-side flow issue.
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ updated: 2026-04-20
- David clarified additional Fidelity-side process context: Quy acts as Scrum Master, manages retrospectives, DSE/daily syncs, sprint review, and sprint planning, retrospectives use Miro, Jira is the tracking system, and the Fidelity-side sprint cadence is two weeks with labels like `PDIAP 26Q1.1` and `PDIAP 26Q2.1`.
- David corrected the Q2 sprint examples: `PDIAP 26Q2.1` is `3/26 - 4/09`, and `PDIAP 26Q2.2` is `4/09 - 4/23`.
- David clarified that Jira should be represented as a first-class Fidelity tool/system because it is used more heavily than Confluence in day-to-day work tracking.
- David clarified that `PDIAP-15838` is assigned to the next sprint, so it should not be described as current-sprint in-progress implementation work.
---