feat: Update work items and daily notes, closing completed tasks and prioritizing REST activation investigation on iOS
This commit is contained in:
@@ -15,10 +15,11 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Track REST migration findings
|
||||
- Debug Discourse and AO issues
|
||||
- Prepare better updates for the current manager or stakeholder through Mattermost
|
||||
- Follow up on active tickets through `project-knowledge/02-work-items/`, especially `PDIAP-14859`, `PDIAP-15765`, `PDIAP-15836`, and `PDIAP-15838`
|
||||
- Wrap up `PDIAP-14859` by publishing the approved rollout document, linking the spike-result documents and follow-up story, then closing the spike
|
||||
- After the immediate `PDIAP-14859` closeout and `PDIAP-15765` resume work, return to `PDIAP-15838`; `PDIAP-15836` comes later
|
||||
- Finish `PDIAP-15765` propagation after the XFlow `2.8.48` release by carrying the already-published XFlowViewMaker update through the Fid4 PR and downstream consumer path
|
||||
- Follow up on active tickets through `project-knowledge/02-work-items/`, especially `PDIAP-15838` and `PDIAP-15836`
|
||||
- `PDIAP-15765` is done and `PDIAP-14859` is also done
|
||||
- `PDIAP-15838` is now in progress
|
||||
- The current top priority is investigating why REST is not activating on iOS
|
||||
- `PDIAP-15836` comes after the current REST-investigation / Apollo-removal work
|
||||
- Keep the separate `HybridBrokerageAccountOpening` / `JointIdentityCheck` scenario out of `PDIAP-15765` scope unless later evidence proves it belongs there
|
||||
- Include feature-flag planning for the broader UIKit-removal spike, including dismissal sequencing changes that affect consumers
|
||||
- Thoroughly verify current `ApexBridgingAddressComponent` / rule-loading usage before describing it as inactive or dead code
|
||||
@@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- When describing the XFlowSDK fallback PR, frame it as a compatibility improvement for similar future `birthDate` payloads, not as a fix for the separate `HybridBrokerageAccountOpening` / `JointIdentityCheck` issue
|
||||
- The Youth / `TeenIdentityCheck` issue was iOS-only; do not describe it as reproducing on both platforms
|
||||
- The service-side payload update and the XFlowSDK fallback PR address the same Youth / `TeenIdentityCheck` issue; do not split them into separate Youth issues when summarizing scope
|
||||
- The `PDIAP-15765` compatibility fix is now merged and released in XFlow `2.8.48`; the XFlowViewMaker follow-up has also been approved, published, and unblocked in Fid4 through a podspec-repo change, and the current downstream step is the open Fid4 PR/update path
|
||||
- The `PDIAP-15765` compatibility fix is now fully closed out and the story is in Done
|
||||
- A new urgent consumer report says REST calls fail on iOS when the toggle is enabled, but current local validation says REST works on both `main` and `release/4.30`; treat version/flag mismatch as the leading explanation until broader evidence says otherwise
|
||||
- Before closing out the AO thread, send one more working-group Teams reply that summarizes the original iOS issue, links the Jira comment, Discourse comment, and PR, and separates the remaining `HybridBrokerageAccountOpening` / `JointIdentityCheck` service-side issue
|
||||
- The `HybridBrokerageAccountOpening` / `JointIdentityCheck` rule-content issue appears unchanged between QA and Production in Cogstore and should be treated as the remaining service-side follow-up
|
||||
@@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Keeping REST deprecation scope explicit while GraphQL fallback still exists
|
||||
- Current LaunchDarkly access does not include Flagship LD projects; only the sample app LD project is available from David's side
|
||||
- Defining a consumer rollout plan for UIKit-removal sequencing changes, including validation, communication, and feature-flag retirement
|
||||
- Closing `PDIAP-14859` cleanly with the right links, blocker relationship, and feature-flag wording
|
||||
- Investigating why REST is not activating on iOS before continuing broader REST-migration cleanup
|
||||
- Avoiding assumptions when comparing iOS and Android validation behavior; scenario-specific parity needs to be confirmed before reporting scope
|
||||
- Avoiding assumptions about legacy Apex/ApexKit paths; breakpoint evidence and helper usage both need to be reconciled before reporting ownership or replacement guidance
|
||||
- When ownership is still uncertain under production pressure, prefer rollback-plus-investigation framing over confident blame assignment to consumers
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user