feat: expand validation scope for PDIAP-12284 and PDIAP-15836, including broader entry and dismissal testing in both UIKit and SwiftUI modes

project-knowledge/01-current/current-work.md

@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ tags:
 - Follow-up SampleApp validation found a likely branch-introduced dismissal regression caused by host-mode mismatch: SampleApp uses `initialViewController(...)` / UIKit presentation, but the branch defaulted manager host mode to SwiftUI, so `endActivity` can take the SwiftUI subject path without a SwiftUI dismissal host subscriber. Fix direction should preserve existing behavior by keeping `initialViewController(...)` on the UIKit dismiss-completion path and `makeInitialFlowView(...)` on the SwiftUI lifecycle path.
 - SampleApp should support explicit validation of both UIKit-host and SwiftUI-host scenarios. XFlowSDK should remain self-aware of which dismissal mechanism to use based on the active integration path, so SampleApp can exercise both paths without relying on stale singleton/default host-mode state.
 - May 14 SampleApp iteration: SampleApp was updated to choose between UIKit-host (`initialViewController(...)`) and SwiftUI-host (`makeInitialFlowView(...)`) paths from the existing `Use SwiftUI` setting / feature-toggle path. XFlowSDK entrypoints now prepare the matching dismissal mechanism, and the SampleApp SwiftUI-host rendering was refined to use a `ViewBuilder`/`flowContent` approach rather than storing an `AnyView` in state. Next validation is SampleApp back-to-back host-mode switching plus Fid4 AccountLink revalidation in both host modes.
+- Jeff recommended expanding validation beyond AccountLink before PR review: test as many current Fid4 XFlow entry and dismissal points as possible in both default SwiftUI-host and forced UIKit-host modes, with particular attention to AO flows. Use the existing Confluence entry-point list as a starting point, but verify it against current code and temporary logs because some entries may be stale.
 - Keep the separate `HybridBrokerageAccountOpening` / `JointIdentityCheck` scenario out of `PDIAP-15765` scope unless later evidence proves it belongs there
 - Include feature-flag planning for the broader UIKit-removal spike, including dismissal sequencing changes that affect consumers
 - Thoroughly verify current `ApexBridgingAddressComponent` / rule-loading usage before describing it as inactive or dead code