feat: Update people statuses and communication context for clarity and accuracy
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ type: person
|
||||
project: fidelity
|
||||
role: manager
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
updated: 2026-04-16
|
||||
updated: 2026-04-17
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- person
|
||||
- fidelity
|
||||
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Current direct manager for the active Fidelity project.
|
||||
- Frequently rewrote PR descriptions, Jira updates, and cross-team messages before they were sent
|
||||
- Regularly redirected work based on release risk, consumer pressure, or manager/stakeholder expectations
|
||||
- Often pushed for explicit distinction between framework bugs, consumer bugs, service issues, and scope creep
|
||||
- Acts as the main communication bridge into the Fidelity-side Teams context while David works from the All-Win Software side
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ Good updates usually clarify:
|
||||
- Jeff feedback is often a signal to tighten wording before communicating externally
|
||||
- Jeff often asks for evidence, reproduction detail, and exact next action before approving external communication
|
||||
- If a draft is still ambiguous, Jeff may prefer to rewrite it directly so the external version is unambiguous and does not generate avoidable follow-up
|
||||
- Jeff is often the person who reports progress or status into the Fidelity-facing context after David advances the implementation or investigation work
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user