feat: Organize context files and enhance documentation for clarity and structure
This commit is contained in:
39
ai/context/systems/xflowsdk.md
Normal file
39
ai/context/systems/xflowsdk.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
# XFlowSDK
|
||||
|
||||
## Role
|
||||
|
||||
XFlowSDK is the backend-driven UI engine that renders Fidelity flows from service-provided configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Durable Context
|
||||
|
||||
- XFlow behavior depends on backend rules, entry point, and authentication state.
|
||||
- SwiftUI migration work introduced recurring behavior questions that were not just visual; many were contract or lifecycle issues.
|
||||
- Historical Slack patterns show recurring topics around:
|
||||
- component type expansion in SwiftUI
|
||||
- Next-button visibility rules
|
||||
- markdown link handling and analytics
|
||||
- modal presentation and dismissal sequencing
|
||||
- consumer-vs-framework ownership boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Debugging Implications
|
||||
|
||||
- Do not treat XFlow output as static UI; backend configuration can change the result.
|
||||
- When behavior differs across environments, check whether the issue is:
|
||||
- service/configuration driven
|
||||
- auth-state driven
|
||||
- entry-point driven
|
||||
- consumer-integration driven
|
||||
- Some apparent XFlow regressions historically turned out to be consumer, pipeline, or environment issues.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Historical Signals From Slack
|
||||
|
||||
- SwiftUI behavior repeatedly needed parity work beyond UIKit assumptions.
|
||||
- Next-button visibility logic required using the full set of service parameters, not only label text.
|
||||
- Modal, delegate, and lifecycle sequencing became recurring themes in pure SwiftUI environments.
|
||||
- XFlow work often had to be validated through consumer repositories, not only inside the SDK.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user