Add daily logs and templates for Fidelity project

- Created daily log entries for April 13-16, 2026, capturing standup contexts, Mattermost syncs, and ongoing work items.
- Established a daily logs index for easy navigation of daily entries.
- Introduced templates for daily notes, decisions, meeting notes, people, systems, and work items to standardize documentation.
- Developed maps for AI workspace core, current work, Fidelity domain, and work items to enhance workspace navigation.
- Implemented base configurations for daily notes, decisions, people, systems, work items, and workstreams to streamline data management.
- Added a placeholder for attachments to facilitate file organization.
This commit is contained in:
2026-04-16 16:01:19 -06:00
parent 90043ab6bf
commit b82194bc55
129 changed files with 4777 additions and 251 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
---
type: guidance
project: fidelity
status: active
updated: 2026-04-16
tags:
- ios
- fidelity
---
# Project Swift Guidance
## Goal
Apply Swift/iOS advice in a way that fits Fidelity's XFlow, Fid4, XFlowViewMaker, and FTFrameworks environment.
---
## Fidelity-Specific Constraints
- XFlow is backend-driven; UI behavior may be service/configuration driven, not purely local Swift code.
- Fid4 is the real consumer validation target for many issues.
- XFlowViewMaker and FTFrameworks can affect whether a fix is visible in Fid4.
- REST migration constraints still matter; do not assume REST is active by default.
- Some work happens behind feature flags, especially risky consumer-impact changes.
---
## SwiftUI / XFlow Priorities
- Treat modal presentation, dismissal sequencing, and lifecycle boundaries as high-risk areas.
- Be careful when removing UIKit bridges such as `UIHostingController`; preserve consumer behavior and rollout safety.
- When discussing SwiftUI architecture, include how the change affects:
- backend-driven flow rendering
- consumer app integration
- feature flags
- validation in Fid4
- UIKit/SwiftUI parity
---
## Answering Rules
- If the user asks a general Swift question, answer generally but include a Fidelity/XFlow note when relevant.
- If the user asks about a code change, separate modern best practice from what is safe for the current project.
- If codebase constraints are unknown, say what must be confirmed: deployment target, Xcode version, module ownership, feature flag path, and consumer validation path.
- For manager-ready explanations, connect the technical recommendation to scope, risk, and validation.