feat: Add historical context files for team members and update project documentation with Slack archive import details

This commit is contained in:
2026-04-09 16:21:58 -06:00
parent 85ba522a1d
commit ba7553c68b
16 changed files with 305 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
# Aylwing Olivas
## Role
Repeated Fidelity collaborator visible across multiple historical Slack channels.
---
## Known Context
- Appears in technical discussions about XFlow, SwiftUI limitations, navigation architecture, and dependency risk
- Surfaces cross-team constraints such as security or token access issues affecting pipeline work
- Frequently adds architectural framing rather than only status updates
- Often reframes implementation problems at the architecture/system-design level rather than the ticket level
- Repeatedly advised on state machines, navigation architecture, off-screen rendering, and long-term maintainability tradeoffs
- Common escalation point when the team needs a technical sounding board or higher-level design critique
---
## Guidance
- Treat Aylwing as a useful source for higher-level technical framing and dependency risk context
- Treat Aylwing as a strong reviewer for architecture direction, refactor scope, and risk framing
- If future context clarifies the formal team or title, update this file directly

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
# Bruce Meeks
## Role
Repeated Fidelity collaborator in XFlow-related work.
---
## Known Context
- Reviewed and approved XFlow work repeatedly in historical threads
- Sometimes covered XFlow iOS issues while others were unavailable
- Later context suggests Bruce primarily worked on Android while still remaining a useful cross-platform contact
- Relevant in release coordination, PR review, and parity discussions between iOS and Android
---
## Guidance
- Treat Bruce as a useful source for cross-platform context and historical PR/review state
- If future context clarifies the formal role/team, update this file directly

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# David Delagneau
## Role
Repeated Fidelity collaborator in historical Slack threads.
---
## Known Context
- Appears heavily in pipeline, Jenkins, SonarQube, test-reporting, and release-process work
- Later historical activity also includes Sparta SDK proof-of-concept implementation and framework setup work
- Often provides implementation updates, process notes, and operational debugging context to Jeff
- Frequently handled CI/CD, Jenkins, reporting, and repo/setup tasks while Norman focused on SDK and consumer debugging
- Later archive activity shows him taking lead on SpartaSDK setup, JSON decoding, and repo/bootstrap work
---
## Guidance
- Treat David as a relevant source for CI/CD, release-process, and framework-setup context
- Treat David as especially relevant for Jenkins, SonarQube, Pod/repo setup, and Sparta SDK bootstrapping context
- If future context clarifies the formal role or team, update this file directly

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# Derian Cordoba
## Role
Historical Fidelity collaborator in project support discussions.
---
## Known Context
- Appears in historical pipeline, Jenkins, and documentation conversations
- Helped document pipeline work and supported notification/credential troubleshooting
- Collaboration signal is real but current formal role remains unclear from the archive
- Often paired with David on CI/CD and notification-related work
- Showed up when the team needed operational documentation, release-process notes, or pipeline triage support
---
## Guidance
- Treat Derian as a relevant collaborator for historical pipeline/debugging context
- Treat Derian as most relevant for historical CI/CD coordination and documentation support
- If future context clarifies the formal role or team, update this file directly

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
# Erik Reynolds
## Role
Historical Fidelity collaborator in XFlow-related discussions.
---
## Known Context
- Appears in discussions about XFlow manager behavior, consumer-vs-framework boundaries, and migration constraints
- Raises implementation and sizing concerns in architecture-heavy conversations
- Often comments on where responsibility lies between XFlow and consuming teams
- Deep archive signal suggests strong familiarity with XFlow and Apex internals, especially ownership boundaries and migration tradeoffs
- Often challenged weak assumptions about architecture, sizing, and framework responsibilities
- Useful source when deciding whether a problem belongs in XFlow, Apex, or the consumer app
---
## Guidance
- Treat Erik as a relevant source when historical context touches XFlow ownership boundaries or migration difficulty
- Treat Erik as a high-signal source for framework architecture and responsibility boundaries
- If future context clarifies the formal role or team, update this file directly

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# Gurram Santosh
## Role
Project-related contact involved in issue discussions.
The exact formal role is not yet confirmed in workspace memory.
---
## Known Context
- Repeatedly appears in AO-related testing, screenshot validation, and issue verification conversations
- Often serves as a consumer-side validator or reporter when the team needs confirmation that a fix worked in their environment
- Relevant when tracking whether an issue still reproduces, whether a release build contains a fix, or whether additional consumer validation is needed
---
## Guidance
If future communication makes Santosh's role explicit, update this file with:
- team or function
- relationship to Fidelity work
- whether the person is a reporter, tester, partner, or stakeholder

View File

@@ -7,10 +7,40 @@
## Known People
- [jeff-dewitte.md](./jeff-dewitte.md)
Current direct manager for the active Fidelity project.
Current direct manager for the active Fidelity project; repeated communication gatekeeper and scope shaper in historical XFlow work.
- [santosh.md](./santosh.md)
Project-related contact seen in issue discussions. Exact formal role should be clarified if it becomes important for repeated communication.
- [norman-arauz.md](./norman-arauz.md)
Frequent XFlow collaborator in historical Slack threads; primary implementer/investigator across SwiftUI, AO/Fid4 bugs, and release work.
- [david-delagneau.md](./david-delagneau.md)
Repeated historical collaborator on pipeline, CI/CD, and Sparta/SwiftUI proof-of-concept work, especially around Jenkins, reporting, and framework setup.
- [bruce-meeks.md](./bruce-meeks.md)
Repeated XFlow collaborator who often reviewed PRs, covered iOS work during absences, and later shifted primarily toward Android.
- [jason-mandozzi.md](./jason-mandozzi.md)
Repeated collaborator tied to XFlowViewMaker, FTPlanning/Fid4 integration, release support, and major architectural transitions.
- [aylwing-olivas.md](./aylwing-olivas.md)
Repeated historical collaborator who surfaces architectural concerns, SwiftUI constraints, and cross-team dependency risks.
- [erik-reynolds.md](./erik-reynolds.md)
Historical collaborator focused on XFlow manager behavior, integration boundaries, migration effort sizing, and framework responsibility boundaries.
- [gurram-santosh.md](./gurram-santosh.md)
AO-related contact who often validates fixes or confirms whether issues still reproduce in consumer environments.
- [raj-sundararaj.md](./raj-sundararaj.md)
Repeated collaborator involved in AO issue triage, release coordination, and backlog/story management around XFlow work.
- [quy-mai.md](./quy-mai.md)
Scrum/contact point who repeatedly managed backlog state, points, and closure expectations for Fidelity work.
- [tim-longfield.md](./tim-longfield.md)
FTPlanning-side contact relevant when issues crossed from XFlow into consumer-framework ownership.
- [derian-cordoba.md](./derian-cordoba.md)
Historical collaborator in pipeline and documentation work, especially around CI/CD support and operational notes.
## Usage

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
# Jason Mandozzi
## Role
Repeated Fidelity collaborator in XFlow and consumer-integration work.
---
## Known Context
- Closely associated with XFlowViewMaker, Fid4/FTPlanning integration, and release/version work
- Frequently authored or owned implementation branches later reviewed by others
- Showed up repeatedly in architecture, eventing, navigation, and consumer-facing integration discussions
- Often served as an important source of context on historical implementation choices inside XFlow and related consumer flows
---
## Guidance
- Treat Jason as a high-signal source for XFlowViewMaker and consumer integration history
- If future context clarifies the formal role/team, update this file directly

View File

@@ -6,6 +6,15 @@ Current direct manager for the active Fidelity project.
---
## Historical Collaboration Pattern
- Repeatedly acted as reporting manager, reviewer, and communication gatekeeper across multi-year XFlow work
- Frequently rewrote PR descriptions, Jira updates, and cross-team messages before they were sent
- Regularly redirected work based on release risk, consumer pressure, or manager/stakeholder expectations
- Often pushed for explicit distinction between framework bugs, consumer bugs, service issues, and scope creep
---
## Communication Requirements
- Native US English
@@ -36,3 +45,4 @@ Good updates usually clarify:
- Story titles, points, and scope discussions with Jeff are often worth remembering
- Jeff approvals can change what belongs in current state or work-item memory
- Jeff feedback is often a signal to tighten wording before communicating externally
- Jeff often asks for evidence, reproduction detail, and exact next action before approving external communication

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
# Norman Arauz
## Role
Frequent Fidelity/XFlow engineer collaborator in historical Slack threads.
---
## Known Context
- Repeated day-to-day implementer/investigator across XFlow SwiftUI, AO/Fid4 bugs, version bumps, analytics, and pipeline debugging
- Often coordinated with Jeff on scope, descriptions, approvals, and manager-ready wording
- Frequently investigated consumer-reported issues directly in Fid4 and sample-app parity checks
- Often produced detailed technical findings first, then asked Jeff to polish or approve external wording
- Exact formal role may need confirmation if used outside workspace memory
---
## Guidance
- Treat Norman as a strong source for historical implementation detail, reproduction findings, and release-process context
- If later communication clarifies the formal team/title, update this file directly

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
# Quy Mai
## Role
Scrum/contact point repeatedly involved in backlog and process management.
---
## Known Context
- Repeatedly asked for clearer Jira/state management, points, and backlog hygiene
- Often confirmed whether work should remain in backlog, be canceled, or be reframed as separate stories
- Relevant for sprint structure, story cleanup, and expectation-setting around what counts as production or release-priority work
---
## Guidance
- Treat Quy as an important source for process expectations, backlog cleanup, and story framing
- If future context clarifies the formal title/team, update this file directly

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
# Raj Sundararaj
## Role
Repeated Fidelity collaborator involved in project coordination and active issue triage.
---
## Known Context
- Repeatedly surfaced or assigned XFlow/AO issues and asked for current status
- Involved in release coordination, validation follow-up, and backlog movement
- Relevant when the team needed to align issue ownership, repro state, or urgency with consumer-side expectations
---
## Guidance
- Treat Raj as a useful contact for issue routing, AO coordination, and release follow-up
- If future context clarifies the formal role/team, update this file directly

View File

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
# Santosh
## Role
Project-related contact involved in issue discussions.
The exact formal role is not yet confirmed in workspace memory.
---
## Known Context
- Mentioned in relation to AO or externally reported issue discussion
- Relevant when tracking whether a reported issue needs more investigation or can be closed
---
## Guidance
If future communication makes Santosh's role explicit, update this file with:
- team or function
- relationship to Fidelity work
- whether the person is a reporter, tester, partner, or stakeholder

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
# Tim Longfield
## Role
FTPlanning-side collaborator relevant to cross-framework issue ownership.
---
## Known Context
- Appeared when issues first thought to be XFlow bugs were traced into FTPlanning
- Relevant contact for whether a transfer/add-money bug belonged to FTPlanning instead of XFlow
- Useful when a consumer-side framework fix was needed before XFlow could close validation work
---
## Guidance
- Treat Tim as a relevant contact for FTPlanning-owned fixes and cross-team validation
- If future context clarifies the formal role/team, update this file directly

View File

@@ -44,6 +44,16 @@ The product work happens outside this repository, usually from another machine.
- Not all entry points are reachable from visible UI
- Validation often requires exploratory testing
## Historical Slack patterns
- XFlow SwiftUI migration discussions repeatedly covered Next-button visibility, markdown modal presentation, and custom nav pin/unpin behavior
- Some historical pipeline failures were traced to Apex/ApexKit or Swift preview macro support in the consuming pipeline, not just XFlow itself
- Jeff often requested explicit, polished wording for PR descriptions and cross-team messages
- Historical discussions also surfaced recurring uncertainty around XFlow ownership boundaries versus consumer-app responsibility
- Cross-team dependency issues sometimes involved security, token access, or external pipeline configuration rather than only iOS code changes
- Historical AO and consumer bugs often turned out to be service/configuration issues, incomplete reproduction reports, or consuming-app integration issues rather than XFlow regressions
- Historical integration work repeatedly involved XFlowViewMaker, FTBusiness, FTFrameworks, and Fid4 release/version coupling, especially when validating fixes in real consumer flows
---
## How This Workspace Is Used