Add project-knowledge structure and templates

- Introduced new maps for navigating project knowledge, including "Current Work," "Fidelity Domain," "Fidelity Apps," "Work Items," and "People."
- Created base files for daily notes, decisions, people, systems, work items, and workstreams with defined properties and views.
- Developed templates for daily notes, decisions, meeting notes, persons, systems, work items, and workstreams to standardize documentation.
- Updated scripts and prompts to reflect the new project-knowledge directory structure.
- Removed outdated onboarding and start-here documents, consolidating relevant information into the new maps.
- Ensured all references in workflows and scripts point to the new project-knowledge paths.

agent-memory/workflows/ai-to-ai-prompting.md

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+---
+type: agent-workflow
+status: active
+updated: 2026-04-17
+tags:
+  - process
+  - ai-prompting
+---
+# AI-To-AI Prompting
+
+## Goal
+
+Generate prompts that can be sent to another AI assistant on the Fidelity development machine, especially GitHub Copilot.
+
+---
+
+## Operating Assumption
+
+This workspace does not contain the product codebase. The target AI has access to the Fidelity codebase on another machine.
+
+Therefore prompts must:
+
+- include only the relevant project context from this workspace
+- tell the target AI what files/modules to inspect
+- ask for a concrete output
+- specify constraints and non-goals
+- avoid pretending the target AI already has this workspace memory
+
+---
+
+## Prompt Structure
+
+Use this structure by default:
+
+1. Role
+2. Project context
+3. Current task
+4. Relevant ticket/context
+5. Files/modules to inspect
+6. Constraints
+7. Expected output
+8. Validation requirements
+
+---
+
+## Prompt Quality Rules
+
+- Prefer precise task framing over long background dumps.
+- Include Jira ID and title when the work maps to a ticket.
+- Include current constraints such as REST feature flag, GraphQL fallback, auth state, backend-driven behavior, and consumer validation when relevant.
+- Ask the target AI to inspect code before proposing changes.
+- Ask for a plan first when the implementation scope is uncertain.
+- Ask for code changes only when the desired write scope is clear.
+- Include "Do not assume REST is active by default" for REST migration tasks.
+- Include "Separate external issue from regression" for AO/Discourse issues.
+- Include "Validate against Fid4/consumer path when needed" for XFlow integration tasks.
+
+---
+
+## Bad Prompt Pattern
+
+"Fix this issue in XFlow."
+
+Why bad:
+
+- no entry point
+- no auth state
+- no expected behavior
+- no ticket context
+- no validation path
+- no scope boundary
+
+---
+
+## Good Prompt Pattern
+
+"You are working in the Fidelity iOS codebase. Inspect the XFlowSDK and XFlowViewMaker integration path for `PDIAP-14859 - Spike - Research strategy to remove final UIKit wrapping from XFlowSDK and XFlowViewMaker without disrupting consumer implementation`. First identify where XFlow currently exposes SwiftUI through `UIHostingController`, where XFlowViewMaker consumes it, and what feature flag protects the migration path. Do not change code yet. Return a concise plan with affected files, risks, consumer validation needs in Fid4/FTTransfer, and any questions that block implementation."