david.delagneau/fidelity-ai-workspace
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: Enhance communication and documentation for standup context and work item clarity

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
David Delagneau
2026-04-13 10:24:01 -06:00
parent 07e198a641
commit e0dd7538cc
8 changed files with 32 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
ai/logs/2026-04-10.md
View File

@@ -32,3 +32,5 @@
- Reviewed another screenshot-based revision after the simplification prompt. The top-level rollout flow is still good and concise, but the lower half of the document still retains most of the extra runbook-style sections, so the latest revision did not yet materially reduce those details.
- Clarified the AO/Discourse config explanation for the authenticated `TeenIdentityCheck` DOB issue: the requirement is not to rename the root from `birthDate` to `validations`; instead, the `validation-rules` payload should contain a JSON object whose root key is `validations`, and if the age gate is required it should include `eighteenOrAbove: true`, matching the `CheckIdentity` structure rather than relying on a separate transactional rule boolean like `"eighteen-or-above": true`.
- Further clarification for the same AO/Discourse thread: the reply should explicitly state that the earlier comment was referring to the literal `"eighteen-or-above": true` attribute inside the transactional-rules array, while still distinguishing that from the separate `validation-rules` structure.
- Additional clarification for the authenticated `TeenIdentityCheck` config issue: the `validation-rules` attribute is the structure that drives the check. `CheckIdentity` was already configured correctly. The `TeenIdentityCheck` problem had two parts: the wrong root key (`birthDate` instead of the expected `validations`) and the missing `eighteenOrAbove` attribute inside `validation-rules`.
- For the Rashmi reply, the intended closing clarification is that the previous `CheckIdentity` `validation-rules` shape is the expected model for `TeenIdentityCheck`, and a JSON snippet can be shared to show the expected structure directly.