# 2026-04-10

## Clarification

- `PDIAP-15838` should not be framed as directly tied to the UIKit-removal spike.
- Avoid wording that implies `PDIAP-15838` is dependent on or part of the dismissal-sequencing / UIKit-removal spike.
- Standups should prioritize updates directly tied to active work items and omit side questions such as version reminders that were only for internal context.
- Current focus for today is to finalize `PDIAP-14859` with a dual UIKit/SwiftUI plan that removes `UIHostingController` dynamically while preserving both flows appropriately.
- Omit standup items that are not directly related to a story.
- Use the approved title `Remove Apollo for iOS` for `PDIAP-15838`.
- When a documentation or root cause update directly supports a story, report it under that story instead of as a separate standup item.
- In standups, format Jira references as `ID - Title` or `ID Title`, not `ID, Title`.
- Jeff clarified that `PDIAP-15838` is the next story to work on and `PDIAP-15836` comes later.
- Clarification: the feature-flag and rollout planning feedback applies to the broader UIKit-removal spike, not only to the dismissal sequencing changes; the sequencing work should fit into that same consumer rollout plan.
- Jeff said the remaining spike deliverable is a clear consumer-facing rollout plan covering risky entry points like FTTransfer, consumer communication, XQ1 validation, a 30-day production period with no reported bugs, and a follow-up release to remove the feature flag and old code; he suggested sending that process-oriented document to Quy for feedback when ready.