--- type: daily project: fidelity date: 2026-05-11 status: active focus: [pdiap-12284, pdiap-15836, pdiap-15838] work-items: [PDIAP-12284, PDIAP-15836, PDIAP-15838] blockers: [fid4-validation-environment-warnings] tags: - daily - fidelity updated: 2026-05-11 --- # 2026-05-11 ## Focus - Continue the combined `PDIAP-12284` / `PDIAP-15836` work, with emphasis on the `PDIAP-12284` SwiftUI-host / UIKit-wrapper-removal path and dismissal-sequencing validation. - Prepare Fid4 `4.32` for a likely REST-layer validation meeting, including release-branch setup, published `Podfile.lock` alignment, and XFlow entry-point readiness. --- ## Work Done - Continued the `PDIAP-12284` implementation/validation loop with Copilot using a simulator console log from the current session. - Prepared a separate Fid4 project folder on the `4.32` release branch and used the `Podfile.lock` from the published/internal `4.32` build downloaded through iOSInstaller. - Built the Fid4 `4.32` setup successfully to verify readiness for the upcoming REST-layer validation session. - Jeff confirmed the feature flag strategy (host-mode resolution centralized in XFlowViewMaker) should be implemented as part of this branch's work. - Submitted weekly hours for the week ending May 9. --- ## Findings - The latest log review reported two dismissal sequences with the expected order: `endActivity` requested, dismiss requested, host received dismiss request, host disappearance confirmed, `fireEndActivityDelegates`, delegate event/exit callbacks, then `activitySession` cleared. - The log review did not surface the key failure patterns that would invalidate the dismissal sequencing, such as delegate firing before host-disappearance confirmation or multiple host-disappearance confirmations for the same dismissal id. - Remaining non-XFlow log noise appears to be environment/integration related: Objective-C duplicate class warnings for `Secure` / `DeviceRisk` symbols from both `SecureDocV.framework` and `Fid4.debug.dylib`, Firebase configuration warnings, simulator noise, and raw device-token prints. - Treat the dismissal sequencing result as a promising validation run, but avoid calling the full story complete until the branch is reviewed and any required consumer validation is done. - Current code-review concerns for `PDIAP-12284`: avoid duplicating host-mode enums across XFlowViewMaker `FlowConfig` and XFlowSDK if a single shared/public type can safely express the contract; reconsider names that include `Fallback` if they make the feature sound temporary or removal-specific; align the feature-flag name with existing Fidelity style such as the `iOS-` prefix; and review whether the new `AnyView` usage in `buildFlow` is necessary or can be replaced with a type-safer SwiftUI alternative. - Current XQ1 validation appears to have `iOS-XflowRestEnabled` already active, so Fid4 is loading REST even before the planned toggle-change meeting. - The simplest non-authenticated Fid4 entry point identified for quick XFlow validation is `Open an account`. - **REST backend deployed** (per Jeff): the REST back end has been deployed and a validation meeting is scheduled for May 12 with the team lead and Bruce. They will toggle the REST flag during the meeting and test both states. - Jeff asked David to smoke-test Fid4 `4.32` non-REST flows today ahead of the meeting — confirm XFlow comes up without issues while the flag is still in its current state. - **REST detection for the meeting**: use Charles Proxy to verify `/xflow/api` endpoints for REST path and inspect `mobile.launchdarkly.com` bulk payloads for the raw evaluated flag value. - **Production testing status**: Raj is trying to get approval to test in production. If approved, or if they simply flip the toggle in production, a production test account will be needed — currently only Bruce is known to have one. David found a way to force the production environment from the simulator. --- ## Next Steps - Continue reviewing the `PDIAP-12284` implementation and confirm the SwiftUI-host default path and temporary UIKit-hosted path are both routed and validated as intended. - Ask Copilot to evaluate host-mode type ownership, naming, flag naming, and `AnyView` alternatives before accepting the current diff. - Decide whether the duplicate `Secure` / `DeviceRisk` class warnings are only known environment noise or need separate follow-up before relying on the validation session. - Avoid sharing raw logs without redacting device-token prints. - **Smoke-test Fid4 `4.32` non-REST flows today** before the May 12 meeting — open several XFlow entry points and confirm they load without issues in the current (likely REST, per XQ1 flag state) configuration. - Prepare for the May 12 REST-layer validation meeting: have Fid4 `4.32` running in simulator, Charles Proxy capturing, and the list of known Fid4 XFlow entry points ready for screen-share walkthrough with Jeff/the team lead. - Be ready to show both REST (`/xflow/api`) and non-REST (if the toggle is flipped) behavior during the meeting. --- ## Blockers - No story blocker confirmed, but the Fid4 validation session includes duplicate-class warnings that may need triage if runtime casting/crash behavior appears during validation. - Production testing may require a test account that only Bruce currently has; coordination needed if the team decides to test in production during or after the May 12 meeting.