Files
fidelity-ai-workspace/project-knowledge/03-context/process/jira-story-rules.md
david.delagneau dbc1894e27 Add project-knowledge structure and templates
- Introduced new maps for navigating project knowledge, including "Current Work," "Fidelity Domain," "Fidelity Apps," "Work Items," and "People."
- Created base files for daily notes, decisions, people, systems, work items, and workstreams with defined properties and views.
- Developed templates for daily notes, decisions, meeting notes, persons, systems, work items, and workstreams to standardize documentation.
- Updated scripts and prompts to reflect the new project-knowledge directory structure.
- Removed outdated onboarding and start-here documents, consolidating relevant information into the new maps.
- Ensured all references in workflows and scripts point to the new project-knowledge paths.
2026-04-17 15:52:08 -06:00

1.3 KiB

type, project, status, updated, tags
type project status updated tags
process fidelity active 2026-04-16
process
fidelity

Jira Story Rules

Goal

Keep Jira updates precise enough that the story reflects the real problem and remains easy to reference later.


Stable Rules

  • Preserve Jira ID and explicit title whenever available.
  • Prefer story wording that describes the real contract or behavior gap, not only the first symptom.
  • Include authenticated-state or environment qualifiers when they materially affect scope.
  • Validate consumer behavior before finalizing scope when the issue depends on Fid4 or flagship.

Story-Creation Guidance

  • Create or refine the story after the reproduction path is understood well enough to avoid mis-scoping.
  • Include points and scope only after the work has been framed clearly.
  • If the issue crosses SDK, adapter, FT modules, and consumer app boundaries, the story should say so.
  • If a bug is external or not yet confirmed as regression, avoid writing the ticket as if the root cause is already proven.

Historical Signals From Slack

  • Historical Slack threads repeatedly show Jeff refining titles and descriptions before stories were created or shared.
  • Several story discussions centered on making the wording reflect deeper SwiftUI, lifecycle, or integration issues rather than surface symptoms alone.