Files
fidelity-ai-workspace/vault/03-context/systems/xflowviewmaker.md
david.delagneau 374991a568 Refactor workspace structure and documentation
- Deleted obsolete files: obsidian-vault.md, onboarding.md, workspace-model.md
- Updated opencode.json to remove references to deleted files.
- Revised profile.md to clarify the status of legacy paths and communication evidence.
- Adjusted prompts to reflect new file paths and improve clarity.
- Enhanced daily logs with focus, work-items, and blockers properties.
- Updated work-item notes to include systems, workstreams, people, and related properties.
- Improved context maintenance guidelines to ensure accurate and durable project knowledge.
- Refined base filters to exclude template files and ensure only relevant notes are displayed.
- Updated daily templates to ensure proper formatting and consistency.
- Modified workflows to align with the new vault structure and improve context synchronization.
2026-04-16 16:28:30 -06:00

1.7 KiB

type, project, status, workstreams, related, updated, tags
type project status workstreams related updated tags
system fidelity active
consumer-integration
xflow-swiftui-migration
xflowsdk
fid4
ftframeworks
pdiap-14859
pdiap-15836
2026-04-16
system
fidelity

XFlowViewMaker

Role

XFlowViewMaker is the adapter layer between XFlowSDK and consuming app/framework integration. It is under evaluation for reduction or removal.


Durable Context

  • Historical release work often required bumping XFlowViewMaker alongside XFlowSDK before consumer validation was possible.
  • XFlowViewMaker was a recurring source of coupling between XFlow changes and Fid4 or flagship rollout.
  • Historical Slack evidence shows that version bumps through XFlowViewMaker were often blocked by external pipeline or dependency issues rather than pure feature regressions.

Integration Implications

  • When a fix exists in XFlowSDK but is not visible in consumer validation, check whether XFlowViewMaker or downstream pinned versions are blocking adoption.
  • If the issue involves version propagation into Fid4, treat XFlowViewMaker as part of the release path unless direct-consumption work has replaced it.
  • Questions about removing or collapsing the layer should be evaluated against current consumer integration patterns, not just local SDK behavior.

Historical Signals From Slack

  • XFlowViewMaker version bumps into flagship frequently surfaced PreviewMacros.SwiftUI, Apex, or pipeline compatibility issues.
  • Historical context shows growing pressure to reduce XFlowViewMaker-specific indirection and move toward simpler consumer paths.
  • Slack history also shows that tutorials and release steps around XFlowViewMaker were easy to misunderstand, which made version propagation a repeated risk.