1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
2026-04-10
Clarification
PDIAP-15838should not be framed as directly tied to the UIKit-removal spike.- Avoid wording that implies
PDIAP-15838is dependent on or part of the dismissal-sequencing / UIKit-removal spike. - Standups should prioritize updates directly tied to active work items and omit side questions such as version reminders that were only for internal context.
- Current focus for today is to finalize
PDIAP-14859with a dual UIKit/SwiftUI plan that removesUIHostingControllerdynamically while preserving both flows appropriately. - Omit standup items that are not directly related to a story.
- Use the approved title
Remove Apollo for iOSforPDIAP-15838. - When a documentation or root cause update directly supports a story, report it under that story instead of as a separate standup item.
- In standups, format Jira references as
ID - TitleorID Title, notID, Title. - Jeff clarified that
PDIAP-15838is the next story to work on andPDIAP-15836comes later. - Clarification: the feature-flag and rollout planning feedback applies to the broader UIKit-removal spike, not only to the dismissal sequencing changes; the sequencing work should fit into that same consumer rollout plan.
- Jeff said the remaining spike deliverable is a clear consumer-facing rollout plan covering risky entry points like FTTransfer, consumer communication, XQ1 validation, a 30-day production period with no reported bugs, and a follow-up release to remove the feature flag and old code; he suggested sending that process-oriented document to Quy for feedback when ready.