2.5 KiB
2.5 KiB
Communication Rules
Purpose
These rules keep standups, Jira notes, and Mattermost messages aligned with the actual state of the work.
Rules
- Prefer explicit scope over short vague statements
- Always mention auth state when it changes reproducibility
- Separate external report from regression
- Say whether behavior was confirmed in main when that comparison exists
- End with the next action when writing status updates
- Distinguish clearly between the current issue, unrelated preexisting bugs, workarounds, and follow-up work
- Prefer evidence-backed statements over intuition when communicating status
- Include branch, build, environment, account, flow, or entry-point details when they materially affect reproduction or ownership
- Route ownership explicitly when the issue belongs to a consumer app, service/configuration, or another framework instead of XFlow
- Do not present a fix as ready if it introduces a new bug or unresolved regression
- Administrative/project-tracking updates should be prompt when others are visibly waiting on them
English Quality Rules
- Write in natural, professional US English that sounds like a fluent engineer wrote it
- Prefer direct phrasing over literal or translated-sounding wording
- Avoid unnecessary softeners or filler such as "actually," "I think" or "for now" unless they add real scope or uncertainty
- If the message was originally rough or written by a non-native speaker, rewrite it fully instead of preserving awkward phrasing
- If a sentence can be misunderstood by a manager, stakeholder, or consumer team, rewrite it before sending
Repeated Senior Communication Lessons
- Test in the closest real consumer environment first when consumer-specific behavior is under investigation, but use the sample app to rule ownership in or out quickly
- Before escalating or concluding root cause, reduce uncertainty with available evidence: screenshots, videos, logs, code comparison, version checks, and parity checks across web/UIKit/SwiftUI/Fid4
- Keep one issue per update unless a second issue is explicitly called out as separate scope
- If blocked, communicate what was tried, what was ruled out, and the exact remaining question
- Use Context, Observation, Action framing when possible so status is easy to forward without rewriting
Avoid
- "same behavior"
- "looks good"
- "seems fixed"
- "working now"
- "it should be fine"
- "for some reason"
- "I think it's fixed" when evidence exists or is needed
Use concrete statements instead.