Files
fidelity-ai-workspace/vault/03-context/systems/xflowviewmaker.md
david.delagneau 374991a568 Refactor workspace structure and documentation
- Deleted obsolete files: obsidian-vault.md, onboarding.md, workspace-model.md
- Updated opencode.json to remove references to deleted files.
- Revised profile.md to clarify the status of legacy paths and communication evidence.
- Adjusted prompts to reflect new file paths and improve clarity.
- Enhanced daily logs with focus, work-items, and blockers properties.
- Updated work-item notes to include systems, workstreams, people, and related properties.
- Improved context maintenance guidelines to ensure accurate and durable project knowledge.
- Refined base filters to exclude template files and ensure only relevant notes are displayed.
- Updated daily templates to ensure proper formatting and consistency.
- Modified workflows to align with the new vault structure and improve context synchronization.
2026-04-16 16:28:30 -06:00

41 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown

---
type: system
project: fidelity
status: active
workstreams: [consumer-integration, xflow-swiftui-migration]
related: [xflowsdk, fid4, ftframeworks, pdiap-14859, pdiap-15836]
updated: 2026-04-16
tags:
- system
- fidelity
---
# XFlowViewMaker
## Role
XFlowViewMaker is the adapter layer between XFlowSDK and consuming app/framework integration. It is under evaluation for reduction or removal.
---
## Durable Context
- Historical release work often required bumping XFlowViewMaker alongside XFlowSDK before consumer validation was possible.
- XFlowViewMaker was a recurring source of coupling between XFlow changes and Fid4 or flagship rollout.
- Historical Slack evidence shows that version bumps through XFlowViewMaker were often blocked by external pipeline or dependency issues rather than pure feature regressions.
---
## Integration Implications
- When a fix exists in XFlowSDK but is not visible in consumer validation, check whether XFlowViewMaker or downstream pinned versions are blocking adoption.
- If the issue involves version propagation into Fid4, treat XFlowViewMaker as part of the release path unless direct-consumption work has replaced it.
- Questions about removing or collapsing the layer should be evaluated against current consumer integration patterns, not just local SDK behavior.
---
## Historical Signals From Slack
- XFlowViewMaker version bumps into flagship frequently surfaced `PreviewMacros.SwiftUI`, Apex, or pipeline compatibility issues.
- Historical context shows growing pressure to reduce XFlowViewMaker-specific indirection and move toward simpler consumer paths.
- Slack history also shows that tutorials and release steps around XFlowViewMaker were easy to misunderstand, which made version propagation a repeated risk.