fidelity-ai-workspace/prompts/standup.md

Standup Prompt

Use project-knowledge/01-current/current-work.md, project-knowledge/01-current/work-items.md, the detailed files referenced from that active-work summary, project-knowledge/03-context/project.md, project-knowledge/03-context/workstreams/index.md, project-knowledge/03-context/process/communication.md, project-knowledge/04-people/manager.md, the previous workday communication context, today's daily note if present, and the latest available communication context.

Generate a standup update for the active project profile.

Output contract

• Use the greeting required by the active profile or command. If no greeting is specified, omit the greeting and start with the previous-work section.
• Return the greeting, a previous-work section, and Today:
• Include Blockers: only when there is a real blocker to report; omit the entire section when there are no blockers
• Use Yesterday: only when the previous-work section truly refers to yesterday; otherwise use a truthful label such as Last workday: or the weekday/date when clearer
• Return Markdown that is ready to copy/paste directly into the configured team communication tool
• Use one top-level bullet per work item
• Use indented sub-bullets only when they improve clarity
• Prefer one concise sub-bullet when nearby events are part of the same continuous context
• Keep sub-bullets in chronological order within each work item
• Keep the whole standup concise and ready to send

Selection rules

• Use the most recent context only
• Yesterday must describe work that actually happened on the previous workday, not older status changes that still appear in current memory
• On Mondays, use Friday's work context unless a later prior day has Mattermost activity
• If the previous calendar day has no work activity or is OOO/weekend, use the latest prior day with Mattermost activity
• Treat the previous workday communication context as the primary source for the previous-work section
• If a latest daily log exists, use its Work Done and same-day findings as the primary source for Yesterday; use current memory only to disambiguate, not to backfill unrelated older events
• Do not reuse older investigation context from current-work.md as Yesterday unless the latest daily log or previous-workday communication confirms it happened on that workday
• Prefer updates directly tied to active work items over side questions, context refreshes, or manager-only reminders
• Exclude items that are not directly tied to a story unless they are true blockers
• Do not mention stories assigned to a future sprint unless they are a real blocker for today's work
• Do not include Today items that are known not to be worked on today

Story handling rules

• Mention work item IDs and approved titles when they are available and clearly tied to the reported work
• Prefer including story titles whenever a reported update maps clearly to a Jira item
• Prefer story-based reporting when the work maps clearly to a Jira item
• If documentation, root-cause analysis, or implementation analysis directly supports a story, group that work under the related story instead of listing it separately
• When one work item has multiple concrete updates, keep them under one top-level ID - Title bullet
• When pairing a work item ID with a title, prefer ID - Title or ID Title; do not use commas between them

Writing rules

• Write in natural US English that can be forwarded externally without rewriting
• Write the standup as the workspace user's progress report
• Be specific, concise, and evidence-backed
• Avoid vague phrases and generic progress language
• Mention debugging findings only if they materially changed understanding
• Clarify auth-dependent behavior when relevant
• Separate external issues from regressions when that distinction matters
• For standups that may also be sent outside the immediate team, prefer plain outcome language over internal implementation jargon; avoid unexplained terms like fallback
• If a release or propagation step is waiting on approvals or pipeline work, make the parallel work explicit instead of sounding like the day is blocked on waiting alone
• Do not mention manager or stakeholder names except in the configured greeting or when the user explicitly asks
• Do not mention internal evidence sources or communication tools unless the user explicitly asks

Compression rules

• Combine closely related events into one sentence when they share the same context and timeline
• Split into multiple sub-bullets only when separation improves accuracy or readability
• Prefer direct chronological phrasing such as Started by..., Then..., Later... when that keeps one bullet accurate and concise

Anti-patterns to avoid

• Do not report a work item as worked yesterday just because it is now Done
• Do not pull old closure events from durable memory into a new standup unless they happened on the previous workday
• Do not mention next-sprint work in Today when today's plan is already known and different
• Do not turn context notes into fake progress lines

Format:

Yesterday:

• ITEM-#### - Title
  • Update 1
  • Update 2

Today:

• ITEM-#### - Title
  • Next action 1
  • Next action 2

Blockers:

• ...

If there are no blockers, omit Blockers: entirely.