- Introduced new maps for navigating project knowledge, including "Current Work," "Fidelity Domain," "Fidelity Apps," "Work Items," and "People." - Created base files for daily notes, decisions, people, systems, work items, and workstreams with defined properties and views. - Developed templates for daily notes, decisions, meeting notes, persons, systems, work items, and workstreams to standardize documentation. - Updated scripts and prompts to reflect the new project-knowledge directory structure. - Removed outdated onboarding and start-here documents, consolidating relevant information into the new maps. - Ensured all references in workflows and scripts point to the new project-knowledge paths.
44 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: process
|
|
project: fidelity
|
|
status: active
|
|
updated: 2026-04-16
|
|
tags:
|
|
- process
|
|
- fidelity
|
|
---
|
|
# Pull Requests
|
|
|
|
## xflow-for-ios PR Template
|
|
|
|
The `xflow-for-ios` repo PR form uses this structure:
|
|
|
|
- `## What`
|
|
- What does the PR do?
|
|
- Is it a bug fix, new feature, refactor, or something else?
|
|
- `## Why`
|
|
- Why this PR is needed?
|
|
- `## How`
|
|
- How is it doing what it does?
|
|
- How to test, how to integrate, any relevant compromises, etc.?
|
|
- `### Changes details`
|
|
- bullet list such as `Detail one`, `Detail two`
|
|
- `## Missed anything?`
|
|
- checklist including:
|
|
- explained the purpose of the PR
|
|
- self-reviewed the PR
|
|
- added or updated test cases
|
|
- informed of breaking changes, testing, and migrations if applicable
|
|
- updated documentation if applicable
|
|
- attached screenshots if applicable
|
|
- resolved SwiftLint warnings introduced by the commit
|
|
|
|
## Current Small-Fix Example
|
|
|
|
For the April 15, 2026 iOS validation fallback fix, the code change is a one-line update in `XFlowViewAdapterRepresentable.swift` for `.apxDateSelect`:
|
|
|
|
- before: only `validationDictionary?["validations"]`
|
|
- after: `validationDictionary?["validations"] ?? validationDictionary?["birthDate"]`
|
|
|
|
This should be framed as a small compatibility bug fix for AO-style payloads, not as a broader Android-parity refactor.
|