Files
fidelity-ai-workspace/.agents/workflows/story-draft.md

89 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown

---
description: Draft a Jira story proposal with Fidelity-ready context and acceptance criteria
---
Draft a future Jira story from rough notes, findings, or follow-up ideas.
This command should optimize for:
- professional story wording
- explicit scope
- useful acceptance criteria
- clear ownership framing
- natural US English that the current manager or stakeholder can reuse or forward without rewriting
Input notes or rough idea:
$ARGUMENTS
Read:
@core/README.md
@core/memory/operational-memory.md
@prompts/story-draft.md
@project-knowledge/01-current/current-work.md
@project-knowledge/01-current/work-items.md
@project-knowledge/03-context/project.md
@project-knowledge/03-context/workstreams/index.md
@project-knowledge/03-context/process/communication.md
@project-knowledge/03-context/process/jira-story-rules.md
@project-knowledge/04-people/manager.md
@project-knowledge/04-people/index.md
Today's log, if present:
!`if [ -f project-knowledge/06-daily/$(date +%F).md ]; then cat project-knowledge/06-daily/$(date +%F).md; else echo "No daily note exists for today yet."; fi`
Latest Mattermost context, if available:
!`python3 scripts/mattermost-proxy/read-context.py --mode latest`
Detailed active work item files, if available:
!`python3 - <<'PY'
import re
from pathlib import Path
summary = Path("project-knowledge/01-current/work-items.md")
if not summary.is_file():
print("No work item files available.")
raise SystemExit(0)
text = summary.read_text()
paths = re.findall(r"Detail: `(project-knowledge/02-work-items/[^`]+)`", text)
if not paths:
print("No work item files available.")
raise SystemExit(0)
for rel in paths:
path = Path(rel)
if not path.is_file():
continue
print(f"\n### {rel}")
print(path.read_text())
PY`
Requirements:
- Use `professional-communication` when available.
- Preserve the exact technical meaning of the input
- Rewrite fully when needed so the output sounds like a fluent senior engineer wrote it
- Choose the most appropriate story framing: bug, enhancement, spike, task, or follow-up
- Keep the title short, concrete, and Jira-ready
- Make the description specific enough that another engineer can understand the intended work
- Separate current problem, root-cause suspicion, workaround, and follow-up work when relevant
- Do not overstate certainty; if something is still a hypothesis, label it clearly
- Make ownership explicit when helpful: XFlow vs consumer app vs service/configuration vs other framework
- Acceptance criteria should be testable and scoped to the proposed story
- If the story looks too large or too ambiguous, say so explicitly and suggest spike framing instead
- If useful, include a short note about dependencies, blockers, or coordination needed
- If the story touches consumer validation or release propagation, reflect that explicitly in the description or notes
Return:
1. Suggested story type
2. Jira-ready title
3. Description
4. Acceptance criteria
5. Optional notes on dependencies / blockers / sizing concerns